<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Measuring social media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theawesomeweb.co.uk/blog/measuring-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theawesomeweb.co.uk/blog/measuring-social-media/</link>
	<description>Registered in England and Wales. Company Number 6971536. © 2009 The Awesome Web Company.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:06:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will McInnes</title>
		<link>http://www.theawesomeweb.co.uk/blog/measuring-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Will McInnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenny-bee.net/2008/02/19/measuring-social-media/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Paul, we did, and one the one hand I&#039;ve been quoted as saying last night that there was something mucky about putting &#039;conversations&#039; and &#039;measurement&#039; next to one another, so I&#039;m with you. On the other hand, I did also suggest some agreed standards for the quantitative side of measurement, which probably won&#039;t appeal to you, but might help us as a community to help our clients. That&#039;s here if you want to see more:
http://icanhaz.com/opensourcemeasuring</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, we did, and one the one hand I&#8217;ve been quoted as saying last night that there was something mucky about putting &#8216;conversations&#8217; and &#8216;measurement&#8217; next to one another, so I&#8217;m with you. On the other hand, I did also suggest some agreed standards for the quantitative side of measurement, which probably won&#8217;t appeal to you, but might help us as a community to help our clients. That&#8217;s here if you want to see more:<br />
<a href="http://icanhaz.com/opensourcemeasuring" rel="nofollow">http://icanhaz.com/opensourcemeasuring</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Caplan</title>
		<link>http://www.theawesomeweb.co.uk/blog/measuring-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Caplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenny-bee.net/2008/02/19/measuring-social-media/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t go... Maybe you can tell me, did the issue of qualitative measuring/evaluation come up? I really fear a rush towards finding &#039;metrics&#039; that pin social media conversations and discourses like butterflies (or maybe like blancmange to the ceiling to mix metaphors). Churning out Excel and PowerPoint graphs doesn&#039;t help us measure relationships let alone figure out what to do with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t go&#8230; Maybe you can tell me, did the issue of qualitative measuring/evaluation come up? I really fear a rush towards finding &#8216;metrics&#8217; that pin social media conversations and discourses like butterflies (or maybe like blancmange to the ceiling to mix metaphors). Churning out Excel and PowerPoint graphs doesn&#8217;t help us measure relationships let alone figure out what to do with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
